Programming

I recently had to commit a bunch of stuff I’d been working on in a logical sequence, but forgot to include a crucial bit of code until I’d already done a bunch of the commits. I didn’t want to have to redo all of them just to add the missing code, but I also didn’t want to end up with a commit sequence that wouldn’t work if checked out at a point before the missing code. This is where Git saved my ass. While I use TortoiseGit rather than the commandline, the concepts are the same:

Turns out to be quite simple, the answer found here. Suppose you’re on a branch branch. Perform these steps:

• create a temporary branch from the commit after you want to insert the new commit (in this case commit A):

  git checkout -b temp A
  

• perform the changes and commit them, creating a the commit, let’s call it N:

  git commit -a -m "Message"
  

  (or git add followed by git commit)

• rebase the commits you want to have after the new commit (in this case commits B and C) onto the new commit:

  git rebase temp branch
  

^{(possibly you need to use -p to preserve merges, if there were any - thanks to a no longer existing comment by ciekawy)}

• delete the temporary branch:

  git branch -d temp
  

After this, the history looks as follows:

A -- N -- B -- C

It is of course possible that some conflicts will appear while rebasing.

In case your branch is not local-only this will introduce rewriting history, so might cause serious problems.

This excellent video by Physics Girl breaks down some of the misconceptions about what we programmers actually do and why we do what we do, with a focus on women and femme people in the field. I could relate especially to the discussion about it being very much about enjoying problem solving.