Snippets

Tuna is simply a contemporary body text font. It is contemporary, meaning the merge of charming broad-nibbed calligraphic style with optimized legibility on screen – showing that the roots of writing and typesetting are still in charge when reading “Anna Karenina” on a kindle till 4 o’clock in the morning.

Tuna has a natural fit for cross-media use because the design is based on forms characterized by different conditions of consistency, stability and good legibility. Well defined shapes and distinctive details only become apparent when used in larger sizes, making Tuna a true all-rounder.

With more than 700 glyphs in 10 styles created with a maximum of consideration, it has all the qualities of a modern OpenType font serving the needs of [today’s] communication.

Opinionated but configurable ESLint wrapper with lots of goodies included. Enforces strict and readable code. Never discuss code style on a pull request again! No decision-making. No .eslintrc or .jshintrc to manage. It just works!

[…]

Highlights

• Beautiful output.
• Zero-config, but configurable when needed.
• Enforces readable code, because you read more code than you write.
• No need to specify file paths to lint as it lints all JS files except for commonly ignored paths.
• Config overrides per files/globs. (ESLint doesn’t support this)
• Includes many useful ESLint plugins, like unicorn, import, ava, and more.
• Caches results between runs for much better performance.
• Super simple to add XO to a project with $ xo --init.
• Fix many issues automagically with $ xo --fix.
• Open all files with errors at the correct line in your editor with $ xo --open.
• Specify indent and semicolon preferences easily without messing with the rule config.
• Great editor plugins.

Almost all projects involve some form of dialog window at one point or another. However, accessibility is all too often set aside in favor of quick implementation. Truth is, accessible dialog windows are hard. Very hard.

Fortunately, there is a super clever guy named Greg Kraus who implemented an accessible modal dialog a few years ago and open-sourced it on GitHub. Now that’s nice!

However, his version—no matter how good it is—requires jQuery. We try to avoid using jQuery as much as we can here. We realised we did not really need it most of the time. On top of that, his script is not very flexible: only one dialog window per page, hard-coded IDs inside the functions. Not very practical and certainly not a drop-in script for any project.

So I rolled up my sleeves and improved it.

I made a little tweak to The Session today. The navigation bar across the top is “sticky” now—it doesn’t scroll with the rest of the content.

I made sure that the stickiness only kicks in if the screen is both wide and tall enough to warrant it. Vertical media queries are your friend!

But it’s not enough to just put some position: fixed CSS inside a media query. There are some knock-on effects that I needed to mitigate.

I use the space bar to paginate through long pages. It drives me nuts when sites with sticky headers don’t accommodate this. I made use of Tim Murtaugh’s sticky pagination fixer. It makes sure that page-jumping with the keyboard (using the space bar or page down) still works. I remember when I linked to this script two years ago, thinking “I bet this will come in handy one day.” Past me was right!

The other “gotcha!” with having a sticky header is making sure that in-page anchors still work. Nicolas Gallagher covers the options for this in a post called Jump links and viewport positioning. Here’s the CSS I ended up using:

I also needed to check any of my existing JavaScript to see if I was using scrollTo anywhere, and adjust the calculations to account for the newly-sticky header.

Anyway, just a few things to consider if you’re going to make a navigational element “sticky”:

1. Use min-height in your media query,
2. Take care of keyboard-initiated page scrolling,
3. Adjust the positioning of in-page links.

While it’s still true that You Can’t Detect A Touchscreen, the Interaction Media Features media queries can come in handy in edge cases. Still, don’t assume too much about a device, as both the link above and the source for this emphasize.

Thanks to the W3C CSS Working Group and the CSS community, we have a cleaner solution.

On the Media Queries Level 4 Working Draft, there is a spec for Interaction Media Features that includes three definitions:

• Pointing Device Quality
• Hover Capability
• Rare Interaction Capabilities

These provide the capability to query a document based on the presence and accuracy of the user’s pointing device and whether it has the ability to hover over elements.

Let’s take a closer look at each one:

Pointing Device Quality: The pointer Feature

The pointer media feature is used to query about the presence and accuracy of a pointing device such as a mouse. If a device has multiple input mechanisms, the pointer media feature must reflect the characteristics of the “primary” input mechanism, as determined by the user agent.” - W3C

The key word here is “accuracy” of the pointing device.

• A mouse or a drawing stylus is very accurate and defines the value of fine.
• A finger or a Kinect peripheral isn’t, and takes the value of coarse.

Therefore, we can adapt our UI elements to the user’s pointer capabilities. This is useful for making hit areas larger, if the user’s main input mechanism is a finger.

An example use case for this query is to size the click area of a checkbox or radio.

Hover Capability: The hover Feature

The hover media feature is used to query the user’s ability to hover over elements on the page. If a device has multiple input mechanisms, the hover media feature must reflect the characteristics of the “primary” input mechanism, as determined by the user agent.” - W3C

It’s important to notice that it only evaluates the primary input mechanism. If the primary input mechanism is not able to hover, but the secondary input can, then the query will resolve to none:

For example, a touchscreen where a long press is treated as hovering would match hover: none.” - W3C

• A touch screen device, where the primary pointer system is the finger and can’t hover, will take the value of none.
• A device where the primary input is a mouse and can easily hover parts of the page takes the value of hover.

A good use of this query is a drop-down menu.

Rare Interaction Capabilities: The any-pointer and any-hover Features

On devices that are both touch and have a mouse or a stylus, like the Microsoft Surface, the hover and pointer media query will evaluate the primary input mechanism only.

As Andrea Giammarc pointed out, his Dell XPS 13” touch takes the value of fine, even though it does have a touch screen because the primary input mechanism is a mouse.

[…]

If we want a device like that to take the value of coarse or hover, we can use the Rare Interaction Capabilities.

The any-pointer and any-hover media features are identical to the pointer and hover media features, but they correspond to the union of capabilities of all the pointing devices available to the user. More than one of their values can match, if different pointing devices have different characteristics. They must only match none if all of the pointing devices would match none for the corresponding query, or there are no pointing devices at all.” - W3C

Browser Support Isn’t Bad at All!

Even though this is a working draft, it has pretty good support.

My simple test proved successful on Chrome, Chrome for Android, Safari, Edge, Opera, Samsung browser, and Android Browser, but it didn’t work on [Firefox], Opera Mini or IE.

[…]

I think we are ready to use this feature, and as [Firefox] adds support for it and IE dies once and for all, we will have full support.

A few days ago, I ran into a little problem when using SVGs. I’d created a reusable set of SVG symbols for a project I was working on, and started sprucing it up with all the pretty icons my designer gave to me. As we all know, one of the biggest benefits to using SVG is the “scalable” part of it, meaning that graphics render perfectly at and size, no matter the original size of the graphic. I’m a huge fan in general of SVG, and implementing them into this project was a no brainer for me.

However, a few of the icons in the design consisted of strokes, and those strokes were always 1px in width, no matter the size. When you scale an SVG, it scales everything about it, so an icon that’s scaled up two times would have stroke widths that are double the size of the original. One such example was a “+” icon that indicated there was more content. I had to reuse that icon at small and large sizes, but:

1. I wanted the stroke width at all sizes to be 2px
2. I wanted to create one graphic that I could reuse at any size without scaling the stroke width

Enter The Vector Effect Attribute

One of my favourite things about programming is being faced with a problem. It challenges you to research and find solutions. In this case, I stumbled upon the vector-effect attribute, which conveniently has an available value called non-scaling-stroke. It does exactly what it says, i.e. prevents strokes from scaling as an SVG scales.

[…]

I’d see a scaled up icon including scaled up effects. This one’s dimensions are 4 times the size of the original view box. As such, the stroke would render at 8px. In order to circumvent this, I added the vector-effect attribute to the paths on the original graphic, and set the value to non-scaling-stroke, like this:

This seems like it could be useful for debugging service endpoints or just forms in general.

It’s a perfectly reasonable to want to style the marker of list items. You know: blue bullets with black text in an unordered list. Or red counters with knockout white numbers in an ordered list.

There is a working draft spec that defines a ::marker pseudo-element that would give us this control.

It’s possible to do this styling now, though, thanks to CSS counters. The trick is to remove the list-style, then apply the markers through pseudo-element counters.